In the meantime, the regulator has released a letter detailing guidelines on residual charging proposals and renewables modelling.
Residual charging proposals
In the ‘minded-to’ consultation, published in November 2018, Ofgem proposed two leading options for reform for residual electricity network charges. The options were; a fixed charge, or an agreed capacity charge. Ofgem indicated that they preferred a fixed residual charge.
Most respondents to the consultation also expressed support for the fixed charge. However, there was some disagreement with the structure of the proposal, predominantly with user segments associated with this pricing option.
Some respondents expressed that the fixed charges should take more account of the diversity of non-domestic users, pointing out that individual bands could contain a wide range of different user sizes. It was also highlighted that Ofgem’s proposed basis for segments could be seen as arbitrary.
In light of this feedback, Ofgem’s refined proposal for non-domestic customer segmentation is that:
- total allowed residual revenue would first be apportioned between voltage levels, on the basis of net volumes, as set out in the November 2018 minded-to consultation;
- non-domestic segment boundaries would be set in terms of agreed capacity levels for users at higher voltages where this data is widely available, and net volume levels at Low Voltage (LV). This is in place of segmenting these users on the basis of the line-loss factor classes (as set out in the November minded-to consultation).
Ofgem has identified five national level charging bands for Low Voltage non-domestic users and five each for High Voltage (HV) / Extra High Voltage (EHV) non-domestic users. The banding is the same for HV and EHV customers, but their share of the residual charges is calculated at voltage level resulting in fifteen charges in total.
The refined band thresholds would be applied on a consistent basis across the country. Users would be allocated on a historic basis and updated in line with price controls. Incentives are expected to be reduced in a bid to change behaviour in response to residual changes.
The option for agreed capacity has been left open by Ofgem. The regulator has stated that where more users collect agreed capacity data there could be the opportunity to transition charges to an agreed capacity or more appropriate basis.
The Targeted Charging Review
EIC has a more detailed breakdown of the Targeted Charging Review that can be read here.
In our latest blog we outline some key factors you need to consider when opting for a flexible energy supply contract.
The duration of your flexible energy supply contract is often driven by market liquidity. The trading windows cover 4 seasons (24 months) for power and 6 seasons (36 months) for gas but it’s always beneficial to put a longer term contract in place so seasons can be traded as soon as they become liquid. Longer duration flexible energy contracts provide optimum trading opportunities to manage prices over time. It is also worth ensuring a supply contract is in place to cover any duration that requires a budget to be set.
It’s important to think carefully about your non-commodity costs when securing your flexible energy supply contract. There are many options available. These range from fully fixing all or some non-commodity charges, to having all charges fully passed through at cost. Having all, or at least some, of the demand related charges passed through will reduce premiums. As a result you can reduce costs by load shifting or load shedding. This will however increase the complexity of invoices as the non-commodity charges will be transparent on your invoices with some subject to reconciliations. Non-commodity costs will make up around 67% of your overall costs by 2025. So it’s vital to consider your wider energy strategy as fixing non-commodity costs could limit the potential gains from being more proactive.
Although the commodity element of your costs now makes up a smaller portion of overall spend, this is the element we can influence the most through active trading. Access to supplier trading desks, the ability to refloat volume and the size of tradeable clips are some of the things that should be considered to maximise trading flexibility. Some suppliers will also charge trading transaction fees which can result in additional costs over the duration of the contract so these should be factored into supply contract negotiations. Your preferred trading strategy should also be considered to ensure you’re your contract offers you the required level of flexibility.
When tendering a flexible energy supply contract, including accurate volume forecasts will enable a supplier to provide the most suitable contract offer. Some suppliers will apply a volume tolerance to a supply contract and set limits on reforecasting. So if there are any planned or known volume changes due occur in the future it is important to consider these. Having accurate trading volumes in place from the start also enables effective buying strategies to be implement from a trading and budgeting point of view.
When choosing a supplier to renew with it is important to consider your requirements relating to payment terms, invoicing and data access. Some suppliers can be more flexible than others regarding invoicing and payment terms, and certain factors such as credit can impact on the options available. There are also variations in what a supplier can offer in terms of data access. Whether this is access to consumption data or invoices via a dedicated contact or via an online portal.
Negotiation & Analysis
Suppliers will charge specific fees for managing a contract and offer different premiums for renewable energy for example. Therefore it’s vital to analyse supplier offers on a like-for-like basis to ensure you secure the most competitive contract available. Tender negotiations should consider all aspects of a supply contract to achieve the best contract terms in line with your requirements. The main aim is to procure a competitive contract with a supplier that meets all of your day to day needs whilst offering trading flexibility to suit your strategy.
Click here to find out how our Flexible Energy Procurement solutions can transform your electricity and gas buying strategies.
Taking proactive control of your consumption is as crucial as buying at the right time. There are a variety of options to help manage and mitigate the impact of these charges to your business. Here we explore our top 5 tips to better manage your non-commodity charges.
- Choose your energy contract wisely
It’s important to think carefully about your non-commodity costs when securing your energy supply contract. There are many options available ranging from fully fixed to pass-through. It is important to make sure you’re comparing apples with apples when assessing contract offers and that you ensure you know which option best suits your business before committing to a contract. It’s vital to consider your wider energy strategy, a fully fixed contract could limit the potential gains from being more proactive.
- Better understand your energy data
Unlock the true potential of your energy usage. Gathering data is one thing, translating and interpreting it is another. An Intelligent Bureau uses clever analytics, algorithms, and artificial intelligence programming to unearth serious business insights that turn your site into an intelligent building, delivering powerful savings, and uncovering new and previously unexplored opportunities for additional revenue. Practical solutions could include a kVa capacity review or reactive power analysis to undercover the need for power factor correction equipment.
- Install the right technology to future proof your business
Transform your data into real-time insights; saving carbon, energy, and other operational costs. Intelligent Building Controls can potentially deliver 20% savings on your operating costs with an ROI under 12 months. Plus additional infrastructure such as wind, solar, battery storage and LED lighting can also help to reduce your usage, cut costs and support net zero carbon targets.
- Start to load shift and load shed
Reduce inefficiencies in performance by managing out of hours’ consumption and shifting or shedding consumption when prices are greatest at certain times each day. Around 10,000 UK firms could make around £20,000 a year in cost savings or revenue by moving or curtailing power use at peak times, according to 2017 analysis by SmartestEnergy.
- Take advantage of Demand Side Response (DSR) opportunities
You can get paid if you’re able to reduce consumption from the electricity grid at busy times when the national demand for energy is at its peak or to help National Grid manage system frequency. There are plenty of schemes on offer so you’ll need to decide which is the right fit for your organisation and how best you can react when you need to manage your demand levels. It’s easier if you have Intelligent Building Controls and back-up generation or storage to support your strategy.